Bicyclist killed at Tucson HAWK crosswalk

11/16/2025 A bicyclist was killed when a driver ran a red light at an “activated” HAWK crossing at East Speedway Boulevard and North Richey Boulevard.

This is the only fatality I am aware of that has ever occurred at an activated HAWK crossing.

Police have already signaled there will be no serious charges (“The driver of the vehicle remained at the scene…” and “determined she was not impaired”. At the completion of TPDs investigation, it will probably be forwarded to the county attorney, who will decline charges, because that’s what they do when someone is killed by a not impaired driver. That will bring it back to the city attorney for consideration of misdemeanor (or civil charges, like just a traffic ticket).

I wondered, but never figured out, if 28-672 (causing death by traffic violation, a criminal misdemeanor) applies. It would apply if a driver ran a “regular” red light in violation of 28-645A3a, which is running a steady-red. HAWK signal cycle is flashing yellow,  steady red, then to blinking red before going dark.

There is notable reluctance of city prosecutors, for one reason or another, to not bring the criminal charge.

This 1998 analysis prepared by the Tuscon City Attorney’s office may have some relevance; however that case did not involve a signal.

Bicyclist dies after crash in Tucson

TUCSON, Ariz. (13 News) – The Tucson Police Department and the Tucson Fire Department responded to a collision involving a bicyclist at the intersection of East Speedway Boulevard and North Richey Boulevard Sunday morning, November 16.

Despite life-saving measures the bicyclist identified as, 41-year-old Jennifer Nicole Hall, was pronounced dead at the scene.

TPD detectives found that a 2021 GMC Terrain was going eastbound on Speedway in the middle lane when the 55-year-old driver failed to yield to the bicyclist.

Hall was crossing in a activated HAWK pedestrian crosswalk displaying a solid red for vehicle traffic. She was wearing helmet at the time of collision.

The driver of the vehicle remained at the scene and cooperated with investigators.

TPD officers from the DUI unit evaluated the vehicle driver and determined she was not impaired.

Detectives say that failure to yield by the GMC driver is the primary contributing factor. The investigation remains ongoing, and no citations or charges have been issued at this time.

What’s up with HAWK crossings?

City of Tempe within the last year or two has added two pedestrian (and/or bike) crossings mid-block; one on Warner @ Country Club alignment multiuse path (~ midway between Price and McClintock), and another on McClintock approx midway between Ray and Warner. In both these cases, the signals are traditional 3-stacked circular red-green-yellow lights; NOT a HAWK. I wonder why? Tempe has a number of HAWKS for years along the Western Canal where it crosses Rural, and McClintock. HAWKs favor drivers in the sense that the solid-red phase is very short, and once it’s flashing drivers can legally proceed if the coast is clear.

In any event, perhaps the thought is drivers will respond better to a tradition red-green-yellow signal head as opposed to the odd looking red-red-yellow(?).

(City of Tempe also appears poised to add a signal along Warner just east of Kyrene at a canal crossing, at what was formerly an unsignalized marked crosswalk with refuge median)

Mentioned in the comment below is the suprising fact that Tucson has 130 HAWKs, or at least I was surprised by how many there are.

4 thoughts on “Bicyclist killed at Tucson HAWK crosswalk”

  1. Tucson has a lot more hawk crossing than I would have guessed…
    https://www.kold.com/2025/05/29/fact-finders-how-does-city-select-hawk-crossings/
    “There are more than 130 of them around the city now”.
    Here’s a list:
    https://maps-and-records.tucsonaz.gov/traffic-controls/search/HAWK
    In the considerably larger city of Phoenix, there were about 100 as of a year ago
    https://www.abc15.com/news/operation-safe-roads/phoenix-celebrates-100th-pedestrian-crossing-light-says-theres-more-work-to-do
    Here’s a Phoenix list:
    https://phoenix.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=732da08b4ff54a478ba4e51a50cd87a2

  2. Killing a vulnerable road user with a motor vehicle when there is no fault with the vulnerable road user should be an automatic citation and evidence of guilt. This incident, and the historical one you note, indicate these systems don’t work reliably. If the reluctance to cite is with the lack of explicit law referencing these systems, then write them into law! This goes for all the trendy “bicycle infrastructure” like buffer lanes. These systems only give the cyclist the impression of safety, without actually creating safety. I also think its important to understand (from a law enforcement perspective) that these HAWK signals are used at bike path crossings, as well, and are not exclusively pedestrian crossings, for whatever difference that makes. While I appreciate them, I never trust them, specifically for this reason. I have video of a red light runner almost killing a rider at a HAWK on McDonald and the canal path in Scottsdale.

  3. We crossed at “HAWK” crossings hundreds of times when we lived in Tucson. Never, never-ever, could you trust the drivers to stop. One time, a newbie standing next to us took off when the light changed. We hesitated. The first car approaching in the second lane over stopped, but the second car approaching in the near lane kept going, then saw someone entering the lane and the driver swerved. side-swiping the stopped car in the adjacent lane. A mirror flew fifty feet in the air and fluttered back to the ground. The errant driver just kept on going. The bottom line: the idea of ped or bike crossings on arterials where drivers routinely drive 40 to 60 mph, is a prescription for killing people. It’s just that simple.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *