-
Bicycle Stop Sign changes proposed
Posted on February 5th, 2009 5 commentsa la Idaho. The “Bikes Safe at Stop Sign” bill has been introduced in the Arizona Legislature; you can follow it here: HB2479 (2009, 49th 1st regular session). The bill will make its debut on March 4 before the Military Affairs and Public Safety (MAPS) committee.
See Why I support “Bikes safe at stop sign”.
Portland-based BTA is backing similar legislation currently in Oregon. (see here and here). If anyone has the language of the OR bill handy please send me a link. Montana also has current legislation pending, HB68. Noted cycling/cyclist attorney Bob Mionske supports the concept (and his colleague opposes it).
For Arizona statutes and compliance issues with stop signs go here.
Here is the introduced version of HB2479 (BLUE CAPS is an addition, red like this is a deletion, and [my commentary is green])
Section 1. Section 28-855, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
28-855. Stop signs; yield signs
A. …
B. Except as provided in subsection C, a driver of a vehicle approaching a stop sign shall stop…
C. The driver of a vehicle approaching a yield sign AND ANY PERSON RIDING A BICYCLE APPROACHING A YIELD SIGN OR A STOP SIGN shall slow down in obedience to the sign to a speed reasonable for the existing conditions and shall yield the right‑of‑way to any vehicle in the intersection or approaching on another highway so closely as to constitute an immediate hazard during the time the driver OR BICYCLE RIDER is moving across or within the intersection. If after driving OR RIDING past a yield sign OR STOP SIGN without stopping the driver OR BICYCLE RIDER is involved in a collision with a vehicle in the intersection, the collision is prima facie evidence of the driver’s OR BICYCLE RIDER’S failure to yield the right‑of‑way.
The bill was pushed along due to Rep Patterson; here is a message from him:
The bikes safe yield at stop signs bill has been introduced by Rep. Quelland, with bipartisan sponsorship from Phoenix/Maricopa Cty., Tucson, Yuma, Flagstaff and Prescott. This is HB2479, based on the common sense Idaho law, and we ask for your support at the appropriate time. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
Thanks,
Representative Daniel Patterson (district 29-Tucson)
Arizona House of Representatives
602.926.5342 Capitol
520.398.6000 Tucson
Committees: Water and Energy, Military Affairs and Public Safety
azleg.gov / dpatterson.blogspot.com
Here is the Idaho law, note that it covers both Stop signs and red signals:49-720. STOPPING – TURN AND STOP SIGNALS.
(1) A person operating a bicycle or human-powered vehicle approaching a stop sign shall slow down and, if required for safety, stop before entering the intersection. After slowing to a reasonable speed or stopping, the person shall yield the right-of-way to any vehicle in the intersection or approaching on another highway so closely as to constitute an immediate hazard during the time the person is moving across or within the intersection or junction of highways, except that a person after slowing to a reasonable speed and yielding the right-of-way if required, may cautiously make a turn or proceed through the intersection without stopping.
(2) A person operating a bicycle or human-powered vehicle approaching a steady red traffic control light shall stop before entering the intersection and shall yield to all other traffic. Once the person has yielded, he may proceed through the steady red light with caution. Provided however, that a person after slowing to a reasonable speed and yielding the right-of-way if required, may cautiously make a right-hand turn. A left-hand turn onto a one-way highway may be made on a red light after stopping and yielding to other traffic….2 responses to “Bicycle Stop Sign changes proposed”
-
Is anyone addressing the issue with red lights? Many of them on secondary and tertiary arterials cannot be triggered by a bicycle and we are (required) to either dismount our bikes and activate the pedestrian button or wait (endlessly) until a car approaches and triggers the road sensor. Any chance of us being able to treat such instances with a right to proceed after a complete stop if no cross traffic is evident?
Ed says: Lynn — legislatively, no, going the “full Idaho” was considered too radical at this time. But in the situation you’re describing the signal is “inoperative” in my opinion (insert standard I-am-not-a-lawyer disclaimer here. use at your own risk!), and the law already accounts for that, see 28-645, just make a FULL stop and then go when safe. Dismounting, waiting endlessly, etc. are not required. -
This bill failed? What can be done to resurrect it?
3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks
-
[...] conjunction with the “Bikes Safe at Stop Sign” bill recently introduced in the Arizona legislature, I began to wonder more generally about [...]
-
[...] (this is separate from legislation dealing with stop signs, HB2479) [...]
-
Arizona Bike Law Blog » Blog Archive » Why I support "Bikes safe at stop signs" February 24th, 2009 at 14:15
[...] Stop sign compliance for links to the present laws, and Bicycle stop sign changes proposed for the pending [...]
Leave a reply
-
Lynn Mushorn February 28th, 2009 at 06:10