Is your ebike a play vehicle?

[UPDATE: Arizona STATE law was updated to explicitly define ebikes in 2018.
Tempe has updated their ordinances a couple of years ago (2019?) to explicitly include ebikes; and Phoenix did so in March 2022. So the article below, written in 2009 is here more for historical purposes.
HOWEVER many many other cities and towns have this “trap” in their local ordinances]

Original title: Is your motorized bike a play vehicle?

First, see Moped and Motorized Bicycles in Arizona for general background on Motorized Bicycles. Sort of unfortunately, every individual city or jurisdiction can have their own codes further regulating things.

The trouble Arizona moto-bicyclists generally run into revolves around police misunderstanding (or simply not even knowing) the distinction between a moped (which requires insurance, driver license, registration) and a motorized bicycle (which requires none of that. E.g. here is such a report from Phoenix, and of course that figured prominently in the Scottsdale case.

However, a disturbing wrinkle regarding the use of motorized bicycles in Tempe has arisen. Tempe’s codes are all online; bicycles are Chapter 7, and traffic is  Chapter19. It appears that it is the official position of the City of Tempe that motorized bicycles (but only when the motor is operating!?) have severe operating restrictions. The story is one of my correspondents reports being stopped twice by Tempe police (“and almost cuffed” once!) sometime around early 2009(?) for, get this, riding in the street. The temerity! This from Bill Amato, Police Legal Advisor for the Tempe Police Department in email dated May ? 2009: “In the case of a motorized bike that has the ability to also be pedaled; 1) that vehicle cannot ride on the sidewalk, 2) that vehicle cannot drive in traffic on a street where there is more than four (4) lanes or the posted speed limit is more than 25 mph, 3) that vehicle cannot operate in the bike path while using the motor portion of the bike”. From that description, it appears that they consider it to be what Tempe calls a motorized play vehicle.

Sec. 19-1(6)  Motorized play vehicle means a coaster, scooter, any other alternatively fueled device or other motorized vehicle that is self-propelled by a motor or engine and which is not otherwise defined in Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 28, as a “motor vehicle,” “motor-driven cycle” or “motorized wheelchair.”

Sec.7-1 Bicycle: A device propelled by human power which any person may ride, having two (2) tandem wheels either of which is more than sixteen inches (16) in diameter or having three (3) wheels in contact with the ground any of which is more than sixteen (16) inches in diameter.

Sec. 19-22. Prohibited operation. No person shall operate a motorized play vehicle…  (1) On any sidewalk in the city…
(4) On any public roadway consisting of a total of four or more marked traffic lanes, or having an established speed limit of greater than twenty-five miles per hour;

There are no such prohibitions for bicycles, of course.

For those who are unfamiliar with the road layout around here; virtually all streets would be off-limits. Even little collector roads tend to have at least 4 lanes, and certainly practically every through road around here have speed limits above 25mph.

The idea of whether or not the motor is operating seems like one of those unenforceable things, not to mention silly. After all, if bicycles are permitted to ride along any street in Tempe(and they are), why not a motorized bike?

But that is all besides the point; it seems to me that the “self-propelled” clause in play vehicle means that motorized bicycles simply do not fit the description of motorized play vehicle. E.g. here is an explanation from spookytooth cycles (the instigator and probably the largest purveyor of motorized bicycles): “Motorized bicycles gas and electric cannot be started without the use of pedals, therefore they are human powered as well as self-propelled”.

One final point, #3 of Bill Amato’s prohibitions appear to me to be a confusion soley in ARS of mixing up a moped and a motorized bicycle — mopeds are banned from bike facilities, and moto-bikes are explicitly allowed on them. (see definitions linked at Moped and Motorized Bicycles in Arizona)

I also found a claim over at that would seem to have cleared all this confusion, an email dated Nov 8, 2008, Tempe city staffer Carlos DeLeon  (position?) said “I met with Police Dept and our City Attorney’s Office to discuss your questions regarding motorized bicycles.  We determined that motorized bicycles are not covered under the motorized play vehicle code.” and goes on to say the city considers them mopeds (7-55), i.e. that is where the notion of disengaging the motor to use bike lanes. So which is it? moped? “play vehicle”? who knows??

What about other Cities?

And beyond Tempe; the real fun begins. Except for the city of Tucson (see Chapter 5) which has explicit motorized bicycle ordinances, to get to the bottom one would need to comb through the local ordinances of dozens of cities and try to figure out what, if any, laws apply. Ug.

Well, since I live in Phoenix, it turns out that Phoenix has a nearly identical definition as Tempe (see Phoenix’s ordinances at

Sec. 36-1  Motorized play vehicle means a coaster, scooter, any other alternatively fueled device, or other motorized vehicle that is self-propelled by a motor or engine, gas or electric, and which is not otherwise defined in A.R.S. tit. 28 as a motor vehicle, motorcycle, motor-driven cycle, motorized wheelchair or electric personal assistive mobility device.

Sec. 36-64(A) No motorized skateboard or motorized play vehicle may be operated on any public sidewalk, roadway, or any other part of a highway or on any bikeway, bicycle path or trail, equestrian trail, or shared-use path.

So, if motorized bicycles are considered play vehicle in Phoenix they can’t be used on any sidewalk or road. Note that I’m not saying Phoenix thinks this; I am just drawing a comparison to Tempe’s ordinances. [as mentioned at the top of this article, Phoenix added explicit ebike codes March 2, 2022, Ordinance G-6967]

6 thoughts on “Is your ebike a play vehicle?”

  1. what about if your riding in a area where there is no bike lane provided is it the legal to ride upon a bike path

  2. This is so stupid and shows what a crock the whole dust control and emissions thing is since if they really cared about the air they would allow motorized bicycles 20mph and under.
    Basically they want to control everything for the sake of control. They do not care that the constitution states no law will be passed that limits our right to travel freely. Walking is not what they were stating or they would have said walking. We are all screwed in every way possible. I remember when emissions came into being and there was no one asking for emissions controls except for the united nations. Then dust control and dirtbike license plates …..
    They will regulate us right into jail because then we are cheap labor. The corporate lobbyist pays better than the poor. This angers me because I can drive my f350 one ton crew cab 11mpg nonstop everywhere it will fit but I cannot ride a motorized bicycle 250mpg anywhere and the reason is stupid cops and lawmakers. Is that sick or what. I could be riding a bicycle with a motor that goes 20 mph and getting 250mpg but they are saying not allowed to do this with no reasons given.
    –What is the reason they give for not allowing this?

  3. To answer the topic title question, no, a motorized bicycle is not a play vehicle and should never be operated as one.

    I have been building, selling and riding motorized bicycles in the metro Phoenix area for a year and half now with over 1,000 road miles and I have yet to meet anyone that has ever been cited by police for riding one on the road.

    Though there are certainly occasions when it is just safer to use a short stretch of sidewalk, sidewalks should not be treated like bike lanes on any bicycle powered or not.

    In my riding experience if you are operating your bike safely on the right side of the road and LOOK like a responsible rider by wearing a helmet, glasses, gloves and good shoes the police have better things to do than hassle you over a city ordinance.

    What needs doing since the 2010 EPA rules kicked in however is a relaxation of the 48cc motor size state law as outlined in Arizona Revised Statute 28-2516.

    I have an informal petition form to show your support for a sate law change and the exact text I have sent to several state Reps to try to get the change in this legislative session here.

    Show your support for giving ourselves a break for a change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *