Arizona is behind the curve on this, most other states have already done something similar years ago. Arizona’s previous graduated driver’s license was had no teeth.
According to AAA AZ, who supported the legislation: “Arizona is 1 of only 5 states that does not provide either nighttime driving restrictions or passenger limitations for new teenage drivers”, and “Studies of intermediate driving programs in individual states have reported reduction in fatal crash rates of novice drivers that ranged from 11% to 32%”
Chapter 206 HB2033 (48th legislature, 1st regular session, 2007 LAST YEAR, why did it take over a year to become effective??) Arizona’s Teenage Driver Safety Act goes into effect July 1. Here are its key points:
- Establishes Graduated Driver License, where licensed drivers, ages 16-17, do not have full driving privileges until six months after licensing.
- Increases supervised training requirement from 25 to 30 hours, of which 10 must be at night.
- Prohibits driving from midnight to 5 a.m., for the first six months, with exemptions for job, religious or school activities or family emergencies.
- Limits number of non-family teenage passengers to one, during first six months.
- Establishes fines and extensions of restrictions for non-compliance.
— Trauma nurse has message for teen drivers, AZ Republic, June 2, 2008
I’m thinking a year would have been a more reasonable time restriction.
AAA Arizona has a big transportation legislation roundup here.
Here is some pretty stark statements coming directly from the Bush Administration. Why now, in the seventh year of his administration? Why spoil the streak? Wouldn’t a continuation of current policy — delay and denial — have worked for just these last few months of his lame duck administration? Where is Dick Cheney on this? Continue reading Better late than never?
There is an initiative floating around from some group called the “TIME Coalition”.
A shady backroom deal cooked up between Napolitano and the Arizona Home Builders is almost too much to bear. It seems the home builders have engineered a way to escape any extra taxation (impact fees) by helping out the governor with another of here proposals. More here: nototime.blogspot.com including an image of the leaked agreement
As a tactic to derail TIME’s proposition (should it make it to the ballot), no-new-taxes lawmakers are preparing their own legislative initiative. This would set up a situation where potentially there could be two similar but competing ballot propositions both dealing with “transportation”. Rep. Russell Pearce’s legislation would put a ballot proposition that would levy a 1/2 percent addition general state sales tax whose revenues would be used for building roads. This is meant to stick it in the eye of TIME’s proposition which spends some of its revenue on public transportation — but not very much, 78% is on roads and freeways and only around 20% is on public transit. Rival Transportation Plan Posed, Arizona Republic, May 30, 2008.
Apparently the existing law, §28-2354, which requires that vehicle license plates be displayed “clearly legibly” isn’t clear enough for police, who don’t seem to enforce that law.
Thus House Bill HB2250 (48th legislature, 2nd regular session, 2008) which would make the rules about covers crystal clear: “…a person shall not apply a covering or any substance to the license plate”.
Unfortunately, the provision is tangled up with the abortion debate — strange but true! It turns out the cover thing is in a bill involving special license plates… thus the controversy.
And as if one controversy wasn’t enough, the cover thing is clearly aimed at would-be camera violators.
By the way, probably the most controversial use of photo enforcement was speed cameras on a section of Loop 101 in Scottsdale. ASU engineering professor Simon Washington’s research has consistently showed only good things in terms of safety and even a time savings due to reduced speed — that is the time savings due to fewer crashes more than offset the time lost by lower speed. See Speed cameras help travel time, report says, Arizona Republic,May 13, 2008.
Unmentioned and unquantified in the report are not only fuel consumption, and air pollution benefits. Mean speeds were reduced from 73 before to 64 mph after enforcement. Vehicles’ toxic NOX pollution increases substantially with increased speed. NOX turns into ozone.
Suddenly, a bike lane sign (a real, R3-17, bike lane sign. And by “a” I mean exactly one sign, no others and no begin or end) has appeared on Chandler Blvd Continue reading Phoney Bike Lane Sign on Chandler Blvd
I don’t know anyone who this ever happened to; sort of a worst-case scenario you could be charged with indecent exposure under ARS: Continue reading Public Peeing
I am soooo dissapointed with McCain for the the gas tax holiday thing. Continue reading Mr. Market’s Oil Fix: Higher Taxes
The WSJ editorializes (The Fed’s Bender, Wall Street Journal: Apr 28, 2008) the fall in the value of the dollar as nothing more than poor monetary policy on the part of the Federal Reserve. They point out an interesting comparison between the price of oil in dollars versus euros since 2003. Continue reading Euros and euros
The full paper that was excerpted to become a WSJ op-ed piece can be downloaded from the Pacific Research website. (a good deal, as the cover price is $24.95!).
I should point out that the paper is not a scientific endeavor, and the author is not a scientist by training: “Hayward holds a Ph.D. in American Studies and an M.A. in Government from Claremont Graduate University”. It is more of an outlook and commentary. He tends to think the mass-media (MSM?) has a tendency to sensationalize environmental stories and make everything seem both excessively gloomy and unfairly blame anthropogenic causes — this is probably true. He lists some citations that refute that trend: Continue reading The Real Cost of Tackling Climate Change