Cycling, traffic safety and legal topics; energy, transit and transportion economics
RSS icon Home icon
  • Founder of Yuma Bike Club killed in head-on collision

    Posted on August 17th, 2010 azbikelaw 9 comments

    [Update: on 9/1/2010 the driver was cited Case Number: M-1442-TR-201001097, Somerton Municipal Court]

    Cyclist Doug Flynn was killed, and at least one more rider injured, in a head-on collision last year (Sept 24, 2009) by a driver trying to pass a large farm tractor on a two lane roadway.
    [for a line-item on each fatality since 2009; follow this link]

    A tribute to Doug posted on the YBC’s website reads “Yuma Bike Club is Read the rest of this entry »

  • 11-year-old killed in crosswalk collision

    Posted on August 7th, 2010 azbikelaw 1 comment

    An 82-year old motorist turning left onto Union Hills from 15th Avenue struck and killed an 11-year old girl riding in the crosswalk on August 5, 2010. The direction of the girl was not specified.

    Names have not been released, Phoenix Police officer “Martos said the woman was not impaired and likely will not be charged. Police are still investigating.”

    I’m not familiar with this area or intersection [google maps], though Union Hills Dr appears to be a typical Phoenix “car sewer”; 5 lanes of rush rush.

    The mechanics of the collision are very similar to Maxwell v. Gossett, where the Arizona Supreme court found for the cyclist, and against the motorist who was turning through the crosswalk.

    The so-called “left cross” is a common mode of collision; Bradley Jason Scott [tbagblog] was killed on Tempe a few weeks ago in a left cross (but not involving a crosswalk).

    [azfamily][arizonarepublic][kpho] The kpho piece says in part that “police are trying to determine if she was riding the crosswalk or in the street, because, police say, it is illegal to ride in a crosswalk…”

    Where does such patently false, mis-information come from?

    Is it legal to ride in a crosswalk?

    Setting aside the issue on the relative merits of sidewalk cycling…

    By way of some more background on the legality of cycling in crosswalks; an analysis prepared by the Tuscon City Attorney’s office in 1998 found that (my emphasis) “…it is apparent that under the present state of law in Arizona a bicyclist is not prohibited from riding on or across a crosswalk…”.

    It’s worth pointing out that this conclusion was reached in Tucson where it is patently illegal to cycle on the sidewalk. I am not aware of any Phoenix ordinance that affects crosswalks, thus we would fall back to the same cases and Arizona statutes analyzed in the above memo.

    That being said, saying something is not prohibited is not the same as saying that the car driver must be automatically at fault, e.g. “the court held that bicyclists must still exercise due care and concern for their safety while about to enter or in the crosswalk”.

    Please see Sidwalk Cycling in Arizona for more details and references, especially Maxwell v. Gossett.

    The Police Report

    Phoenix Incident number 10001096939 [I had gotten the number off by a digit from phoenix traffic records, I may have written it down wrong, in any event that caused a large delay in analysis. Victim Madeleine Pila Driver: Marguerite Savarese.

    The ACR is available from the city of Phoenix online, there is presumably a DR as well available from Records but I do not have that.

    The narrative in its entirety is succinct and very desricptive:

    Traffic unit 1 (pedalcyclist) was riding her bicycle southbound in the crosswalk on the west side of the intersection of North 15th Avenue and West Union Hills Drive. Traffic unit 2 (vehicle) was making a left hand turn from norhtboun 15th Avenue to westbound Union Hills Drive. Unit 2 collided with unit 1 in the marked crosswalk. As a result of the collision, the operartor of unit 1 was pronouced dead at the collision scene by responding paramedics

    THE TRAFFIC UNITS ARE LISTED ALPHABETICALLY BY LAST NAME

    Note that in Arizona, “Unit #1 is the vehicle, pedestrian, pedalcycle or animal rider that caused the collision or was most at fault” (refer to ADOT AZ Crash Manual; links here), there is no provision for assigning units in any other way. To do so destroys the usefulness of statistics in the ADOT crash database (ALISS). If police are going to do this, it should be corrected before submitted for final inclusion in the database — was this done? It’s not clear.

    Though there would seem to be no confusion in assigning fault, the cyclist was for no apparent reason listed in Block 20, Violations/Behaviors  ”13. Failed to keep in proper lane”. This is non-sensical. From the narrative the cyclists should have been assigned “1. No Improper Action”. See Maxwell v. Gossett for further verification that the cyclist was doing nothing whatsoever wrong in riding through a crosswalk.

    Though there seems to be no confusion about what the driver did, the driver was listed in Block 20, Violations/Behaviors  ”16. Inattention/Distraction”. That may well be true, however, it is apparent from the narrative that the driver committed a “7. Made Improper Turn”

    In short, the driver was most-at-fault, and should have been assigned unit number 1 along with the violation/behavior noted above, and should have been cited (according to court records, the driver was not cited).

    There is also an apparent error on the ACR but doesn’t affect the outcome, Block 14 Type of intersection is marked as “12 (Controlled Access Area) Intersection Related”. The intersection is not in a controlled access area (a.k.a. a freeway interchange) and should presumable be “2 Intersection Related”.

    The ADOT Database Record

    This is IncidentID = 2414621

    In addtion to what was described above as errors done by the investigating officer on the ACR (and signed off on by a supervisor), the following errors and inconsistencies were noted in the ADOT crash database record:

    • AlcoholUseFlag: 1 (but that is not supported by the report?)

  • Lawsuit filed: Flagstaff cyclist killed in collision with city truck

    Posted on June 9th, 2010 azbikelaw 2 comments

    NAU student Joshua Pete was killed in a collision with a city-owned truck.

    “both traveling westbound on Butler Avenue at the time of the collision, with Pete in the marked bike lane, police said. The investigation so far indicates that the truck and the bicyclist collided at about 11:15 a.m [11/16/2009] as the truck was making a right turn into the driveway. Pete became entangled in the truck’s wheel housing and was dragged some distance before the vehicle came to a stop in the driveway” AZ Daily Sun article.

    Prosecutor completed their investigation, and there will be no criminal charges  [azdailysun]

    AZ Cyclist Fatality Grid

    I am not sure of the final outcome, but from reading the crash report, it sounds as though police concluded that the cyclist attempted to overtake the truck (as opposed to the other way around), and therefore there will be no citations to the truck driver (though see below: Citation?) — and in any event i did not have the detailed / independent DPS report, just the City’s report.

    Lawsuit filed

    A $4M wrongful death lawsuit has been filed on behalf of the family of Joshua Pete. [azdailysun]. The family’s lawyer refers to a supplemental DPS report which contains information they claim makes the truck driver at least partially responsible for the crash “DPS Detective Curt Getting concluded that a ‘contributing factor to the collision would be the wide/late right turn into the plant by the truck driver. The cyclist could have perceived the truck was continuing straight ahead.’ ”

    The 5 page DPS referred to is apparently only summarized in Flagstaff PD’s 80 page report.

    This is apparently the case number: S-0300-CV-201000619  AMOS H PETE  PLAINTIFF Coconino County Superior.

    In what is likely to be the final outcome,  azdailysun.com is reporting on June 7, 2011 the suit will be settled by the City paying $500,000 to the cyclist’s family, pending council approval. “The settlement, which will be covered by the city’s insurance carrier, does not address who was at fault at the time of the collision”, interesting comment — I’m not sure why anyone would care who’s fault it is, at this point probably just a legalese thing; and anyways Arizona is pure comparative (percentages. For example $500,000 is ~ 6% of $8M).

    Citation?

    There is a citation for “UNSAFE TURN OR NO TURN SIGNAL” floating around: M-0341-TR-2010004034, filed 5/23/2010. Then some sort of motion on 6/16, and then comments were added on 6/28 — but as of this writing (on 8/2/2010) there is no disposition, it is just blank…. which is because the case got transferred from muni court to Flagstaff justice court, the defendant has plead not guilty, and the case has been continued and no trial date is set. The case number is J-0301-TR-2010005648.

    Final outcome finally on 12/13/2010:  JDGMT GUILTY/RESP SENT SUSPEND

     

  • Driver Sentenced: Bullhead City cyclist killed in hit-and-run

    Posted on May 23rd, 2010 azbikelaw 6 comments
    Larissa Jean Castilleja

    Larissa Jean Castilleja

    Larissa Jean Castilleja, 43, a Bullhead City High teacher was killed Sept 9, 2009 when a driver hit her and fled the scene.

    This fatality bears many similarities to several of four recent fatalities in the Phoenix-metro area this past summer.

    1. the automobile driver hit-and-ran (all 5 incidents)
    2. DUI on the part of the automobile driver is suspected (at least 4 of the 5 incidents)
    3. time of day was overnight/early morning (ranging from 10pm to 4am)
    4. no improper actions on the part of the cyclist are suspected (all 5 incidents)

    The suspect was later charged with manslaughter and leaving the scene, on Sept 28 he plead not guilty; and according to the Mojave Daily News, has secured himself  all-star Scottsdale DUI lawyer Scott Maasen. In granting the reduced bond, the judge expressed reservations and then … did it anyway! It was also revealed in that story that the defendant has an outstanding warrant for DUI in Nevada, which he says he is not aware of.

    The Plea

    The defendant plead guilty to manslaughter, leaving the scene, and DUI. Sentencing is scheduled for May 21, 2010. Case number S-8015-CR-200900986, online lookup.

    Sentencing

    The [mohavedailynews] had a pretty good rundown of the sentencing:

    Judge Steven Conn sentenced Gagliardi to prison for 13 years for both felony crimes (8 for the manslaughter, 5 for hit-and-run), saying the two charges were separate crimes and deserved consecutive sentences. He only found a lack of criminal record as a mitigating factor and that Gagliardi also had about 20 moving violations, mostly for speeding. He found aggravating factors that Gagliardi’s blood alcohol rate was more than twice the legal limit and the emotional harm to Castilleja’s family. The judge also said he hoped the sentences would be a deterrent to people who visit the casinos and drink then get into their cars to drive home.

    see also [kingmandailyminer].

    Read the rest of this entry »

  • Driver found guilty: South Phoenix Hit-and-run

    Posted on May 20th, 2010 azbikelaw 3 comments

    7/11/2009: location listed only as “South Phoenix”,  in the early morning hours of Saturday,  hit-and-run. Police apprehended Max Ramiro Garcia, 33, in an unrelated traffic stop (speeding). ( azcentral.comKPHO). was charged with manslaughter and leaving the scene in the death of cyclist Robert Flakes; Superior Court Case Number CR2009-145409.

    He’s had a bunch of civil traffic cases over the years, search supremecourt.az.gov and justice court.

    This is one of a chain of similar fatal hit-and-runs in Phoenix that occurred in summer of 2009.

    The Trial and Verdict

    The defendant is charged with manslaughter, endangerment, and hit-and-run w/death. And case went to a full-blown trial (sort of unusual), which lasted seven days. I have no idea what went on, or what was the nature of the defense.

    The Verdict came in on 5/13/2010. the defendant was found guilty of Neg Hom ( a lesser charge, one notch down from manslaughter), and endangerment. The jury also found those two to be “dangerous” offenses, which factors in to sentencing.

    The jury also found the defendant guilty of leaving the scene of a fatal, but (strangely?) found that it was “not proven” that he caused the collision.

    Sentencing is scheduled for 6/17/2010.

    2009 AZ Cyclist Fatality Grid

  • ASU student dies in collision on University

    Posted on May 19th, 2010 azbikelaw 2 comments

    ASU student Christopher Volpe, 24, was killed Monday 5/10/2010 when he collided with an SUV. According to police, the driver of the SUV was not at fault. No impairment is suspected. According to this news account: “Police tell 3TV the man was in the eastbound lane of University near Ash”.

    According to the ABC15 account: “Police Sgt. Steve Carbajal said 24-year-old Christopher Volpe was apparently traveling west on University Drive when he turned left in front of oncoming traffic and was struck by an SUV.”

    I did get some clarification from Molly Enright, Community Affairs Specialist at the Tempe Police Department — the correct information is as Sgt. Carbajal said.

    The turning left in front of the SUV doesn’t seem to add up; given the location of the pictured damage. From the picture, it appears the cyclist t-boned into the middle of the passenger side of the SUV.

    So I am still confused?

    And by the way, as the commenter pointed out, below, southbound Ash vehicular traffic must turn at University — though it’s not clear if that has anything to do with it.

    A couple of the accounts say that “Police have determined that he (the driver) was not at fault” — that was fast.

    In the wake of this tragedy, Tempe’s First Ghost Bike was placed. [azrepublic] story on the ghost bike installation.

    2010 Arizona cyclist fatality grid

    [azrepublic] [azfamily/3TV][evtrib][abc15]

  • Scottsdale cyclist’s death shows problems with law

    Posted on April 23rd, 2010 azbikelaw 2 comments

    The Arizona Republic today ran a heavily researched article concerning the death of Cindie Holub in Scottsdale in February. It also delved into some comparative history into other strike-from-behind cases.

    [also, here is the original AZ Republic story about the death]

    Scottsdale cyclist’s death shows problems with law, Ofelia Madrid and Jane Larson, Arizona Republic, 4/22/2010. Read the rest of this entry »

  • [verdict] Fatality in Tucson — driver was reportedly “weaving”

    Posted on April 17th, 2010 azbikelaw 2 comments

    [Verdict April 12, 2010] The driver who killed Drake Okusako plead guilty, and received a 4-year prison sentence. “On March 1 he (Segebartt) entered guilty pleas before Pima County Superior Court Judge Deborah Bernini to the leaving the scene charge and a reduced negligent homicide charge” Read the rest of this entry »

  • Motorist Pleads to Manslaughter in Cyclist Death on Maricopa Road

    Posted on April 14th, 2010 azbikelaw 1 comment

    Michael Gray (Michael Gordon Gray), 43, died Sunday April 12, 2009 when a suspected impaired driver killed him at 3PM traveling along Maricopa Road nearby the access road to the Koli Equestrian Center. GRIC (Gila River Indian Community) police say they suspect the motorist may have been under the influence.

    Here is near where the collision occurred. Maricopa Road is a fast (posted 50MPH) two-lane rural highway — one relatively narrow lane in each direction, there is a shoulder stripe and perhaps a foot or so of irregular asphalt and lots of gravel

    In the several months that have passed, I am looking for updates on the status of the investigation. From what I gather, sometimes but not always, serious crimes on the reservation go to federal jurisdiction, see e.g. Sacaton man gets 27 years in killing of Gilbert bicyclist (more detail in the DoJ press release). Here’s some more explanations, see “Role of Gila River Indian Community Justice System”, from meeting minutes of the Arizona State, Tribal, and Federal Court Forum.

    2009 AZ Cyclist Fatality Grid

    Criminal Case

    I spoke with Sgt. Hilario Tanakeyowma of GRIC PD (GRIC PD main number — I had some difficulties finding this — (520)562-7139, x7122). in mid-March 2010 and he confirmed that the defendant is in custody and was charged with manslaughter.

    Case  CR-2009007876 in Maricopa County Superior Court, and can be looked up at  supremecourt.az.gov. Strangely, when I looked this up in mid-March, the case was sealed for some reason(?). In any event David Allen Wiechens, Sr. plead guilty to manslaughter. Sentencing is scheduled for April 30, 2010. This carries a presumptive sentence of 10.5 years (13-704 , dangerous, non-repetitive). On April 30, for unknown reasons, sentencing was “continued” to 06/18/2010 at 8:30 a.m.

    Sentencing then did occur on 6/18, minute entry here. Defendant was sentenced to 10 years in prison and ordered to pay $8,019.28 restitution to the victim’s parents, and his driver’s license was revoked.

    Arizona Crash Report

    I obtained a copy of the crash report # 09-14619 from GRIC PD.

    The report written by Officer M. Evins appears to be of very high quality, with several lucid pages of narrative and witness statements. The manner of collision is not at all what I had imagined. There were three cyclists traveling together; but they were not physically together. They were each separated by ~ 50 yards, and they were all riding to the right of the fog line, on the very small paved shoulder. Wiechans passed the first two without incident, after passing the second cyclist he inexplicably swerved sharply, thus striking and killing Gray. Wiechan’s statement was that he saw two cyclists only and then heard a loud bang. There were many witnesses; in addition to the two cyclists who were not struck, the driver and passenger of a car traveling behind Wiechens also saw the whole thing. Wiechans, up until the fatal swerve, did not appear to be driving erratically, according to witnesses behind him. There is a hypotheses put forward by the investigating officer about the fatal swerve: “It is believed that David (Wiechans) was drinking from the open Bud Light bottle while he was driving and possibly spilled it in his lap when the collision occurred because I observed a fairly large wet spot in the right groin area of his pants”.

    Other issues: according to the report the vehicle involved was purchases just a few days before the crash; and that it had no insurance. The investigating officer found an “…Admin per se suspension in the open center console dated 1/2/09 at 2032 hours at a location in PCSO’s jurisdiction with BAC results of .171 and .164 which was impounded as evidence”.  In addtion to GRIC PD, a DPS Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) was called in, and blood was drawn.Though alcohol was clearly involved, the suspect was not apparently particularly drunk, though other impairment was suspected. Any results are not in the crash report — but presumably figured heavily into the criminal case. Read the rest of this entry »

  • Phoenix police seek ID of bicyclist killed in hit-and-run

    Posted on March 21st, 2010 azbikelaw No comments

    A cyclist was killed in Phoenix Friday night; this area is west of the airport and just north of I-17. The victim was later identified: “Phoenix Police Sgt. Trent Crump said 70-year-old Lorenzo Nevares was riding on 7th Avenue just north of Interstate 17 when he was struck around 8:30 p.m” [abc15]

    The approx location: On 7th Avenue near Mojave Street, just north of I-17.

    2010 Detailed Arizona Cyclist Fatality Grid.

    Criminal Case

    That two men were arrested on suspicion of aggravated DUI and leaving the scene of a fatality indicates, I guess, that police believe one of them was the driver that struck and killed the cyclist. Not many other details…

    Case Lookup; Nicanor Fuentes-Adame, Case Number: S-0700-CR-2010115214. Defendant plead not guilty to all charges 04/07/2010: Manslaughter, Extreme DUI, hit-and-run w/death.

    The other guy mentioned below, Victor Popoca, Case number:  S-0700-CR-2010115215 did a plea deal on an aggravated DUI. Which also violated his parole from a previous incident. And he’s had other troubles including speeding+driving with alcohol underage. I’m not sure how or if any of this involves the death of Lorenzo Nevares.

    Read the rest of this entry »