<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State V. Patrick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azbikelaw.org/blog/state-v-patrick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/state-v-patrick/</link>
	<description>Cycling, traffic safety and legal topics; energy, transit and transportion economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Take the lane @ Arizona Bike Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/state-v-patrick/comment-page-1/#comment-2397</link>
		<dc:creator>Take the lane @ Arizona Bike Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=808#comment-2397</guid>
		<description>[...] In a nutshell: some courts have held that normal means normal for a bicycle. See e.g. State V Patrick , which references the Selz decision; both out of Ohio.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a nutshell: some courts have held that normal means normal for a bicycle. See e.g. State V Patrick , which references the Selz decision; both out of Ohio.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

