<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharrow / Shared lane marking (SLM)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azbikelaw.org/blog/sharrow-shared-lane-marking-slm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/sharrow-shared-lane-marking-slm/</link>
	<description>Cycling, traffic safety and legal topics; energy, transit and transportion economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: azbikelaw</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/sharrow-shared-lane-marking-slm/comment-page-1/#comment-11253</link>
		<dc:creator>azbikelaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=263#comment-11253</guid>
		<description>How wide is the sharrow marking? 
Looks like it&#039;s 40&quot;; or 3&#039;4&quot;, see http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycles-may-use-full-lane-slm-mutcd-updates/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How wide is the sharrow marking?<br />
Looks like it&#8217;s 40&#8243;; or 3&#8217;4&#8243;, see <a href="http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycles-may-use-full-lane-slm-mutcd-updates/" rel="nofollow">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycles-may-use-full-lane-slm-mutcd-updates/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bicycles May Use Full Lane, SLM; MUTCD updates @ Arizona Bike Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/sharrow-shared-lane-marking-slm/comment-page-1/#comment-2405</link>
		<dc:creator>Bicycles May Use Full Lane, SLM; MUTCD updates @ Arizona Bike Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=263#comment-2405</guid>
		<description>[...] last time I wrote about Shared Lane Markings,  see Sharrow / Shared lane marking (SLM), they were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last time I wrote about Shared Lane Markings,  see Sharrow / Shared lane marking (SLM), they were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Sanders</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/sharrow-shared-lane-marking-slm/comment-page-1/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=263#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>Flagstaff was granted permission to experiment with SLM in 2007 (refer to http://www.atssa.com/galleries/default-file/4-12-07.pdf and http://www.flagstaff.az.gov/index.aspx?NID=1393)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flagstaff was granted permission to experiment with SLM in 2007 (refer to <a href="http://www.atssa.com/galleries/default-file/4-12-07.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.atssa.com/galleries/default-file/4-12-07.pdf</a> and <a href="http://www.flagstaff.az.gov/index.aspx?NID=1393" rel="nofollow">http://www.flagstaff.az.gov/index.aspx?NID=1393</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azbikelaw</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/sharrow-shared-lane-marking-slm/comment-page-1/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>azbikelaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=263#comment-1798</guid>
		<description>In an encouraging sign, the city of Tucson has placed some sharrows -- this would be the first use of sharrows in Arizona, as far as I know:

http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/tucson-gets-sharrows/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an encouraging sign, the city of Tucson has placed some sharrows &#8212; this would be the first use of sharrows in Arizona, as far as I know:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/tucson-gets-sharrows/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tucsonbikelawyer.com/tucson-gets-sharrows/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critical Width @ Arizona Bike Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/sharrow-shared-lane-marking-slm/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Critical Width @ Arizona Bike Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=263#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>[...] solution would be to remove the stripe, since it doesn&#8217;t belond there anyway, and adding Sharrows (since somebody at the city obviously feels we need some sort of bike facility &#8212; these are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] solution would be to remove the stripe, since it doesn&#8217;t belond there anyway, and adding Sharrows (since somebody at the city obviously feels we need some sort of bike facility &#8212; these are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

