<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jaywalking in Arizona</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azbikelaw.org/blog/jaywalking-in-arizona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/jaywalking-in-arizona/</link>
	<description>Cycling, traffic safety and legal topics; energy, transit and transportion economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCH</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/jaywalking-in-arizona/comment-page-1/#comment-15381</link>
		<dc:creator>JCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=731#comment-15381</guid>
		<description>&quot;jaywalking&quot; in and of itself is a pro-car, anti-ped term. It has no legal definition and is used as a catch-all for any &quot;illegal&quot; ped action. Never mind that many of those offenses aren&#039;t actually illegal (or unsafe). We would never consider using a term like &quot;jaydriving&quot; which would be the equivalent. It should be banished from our vocabulary.

Originally it referred to country bumpkins that walked the sidewalks, creating an obstacle to other pedestrians as the offending rube gawked a the big city sights. Later it came to be used in its current vernacular upon the ascendancy of the automobile as king of the public space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;jaywalking&#8221; in and of itself is a pro-car, anti-ped term. It has no legal definition and is used as a catch-all for any &#8220;illegal&#8221; ped action. Never mind that many of those offenses aren&#8217;t actually illegal (or unsafe). We would never consider using a term like &#8220;jaydriving&#8221; which would be the equivalent. It should be banished from our vocabulary.</p>
<p>Originally it referred to country bumpkins that walked the sidewalks, creating an obstacle to other pedestrians as the offending rube gawked a the big city sights. Later it came to be used in its current vernacular upon the ascendancy of the automobile as king of the public space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azbikelaw</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/jaywalking-in-arizona/comment-page-1/#comment-15205</link>
		<dc:creator>azbikelaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=731#comment-15205</guid>
		<description>The Invention of Jaywalking

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2012/04/invention-jaywalking/1837/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Invention of Jaywalking</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2012/04/invention-jaywalking/1837/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2012/04/invention-jaywalking/1837/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Beecher</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/jaywalking-in-arizona/comment-page-1/#comment-10538</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Beecher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=731#comment-10538</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s just a bunch of crap until someone seriously get hurt or even killed. But there are laws for a reason. You might disagree but because you do doesn&#039;t give you the right to disregard it as either right or wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s just a bunch of crap until someone seriously get hurt or even killed. But there are laws for a reason. You might disagree but because you do doesn&#8217;t give you the right to disregard it as either right or wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mason</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/jaywalking-in-arizona/comment-page-1/#comment-8365</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 23:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=731#comment-8365</guid>
		<description>This is indeed a bunch of crap. There is another neighborhood literally right across the street from my house and there isn&#039;t the crosslights anywhere nearby. I&#039;d have to walk all the way down by the intersection to cross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is indeed a bunch of crap. There is another neighborhood literally right across the street from my house and there isn&#8217;t the crosslights anywhere nearby. I&#8217;d have to walk all the way down by the intersection to cross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pied Piper</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/jaywalking-in-arizona/comment-page-1/#comment-6998</link>
		<dc:creator>Pied Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=731#comment-6998</guid>
		<description>This is a bunch of crap. This government doesn&#039;t have nothing better to do then sit on thier behinds and make stupid laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bunch of crap. This government doesn&#8217;t have nothing better to do then sit on thier behinds and make stupid laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

