Comments on: Is a Bikelane part of the Roadway? http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bikelane-roadway/ Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:20:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 By: Arizona Bike Law Blog » Blog Archive » Two abreastness http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bikelane-roadway/#comment-647 Arizona Bike Law Blog » Blog Archive » Two abreastness Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:19:52 +0000 http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bikelane-roadway/#comment-647 [...] Other gray areas of abreastness: how does one cyclist pass a pair of cyclists riding two abreast? Does riding two abreast in the roadway, abreast of a third cyclist on the shoulder equate to three-abreast? What about a bicycle lane — is a bicycle lane part of the roadway? [...] […] Other gray areas of abreastness: how does one cyclist pass a pair of cyclists riding two abreast? Does riding two abreast in the roadway, abreast of a third cyclist on the shoulder equate to three-abreast? What about a bicycle lane — is a bicycle lane part of the roadway? […]

]]> By: Arizona Bike Law Blog » Blog Archive » Applicability Statutes -- why are there two? http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bikelane-roadway/#comment-241 Arizona Bike Law Blog » Blog Archive » Applicability Statutes -- why are there two? Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:32:16 +0000 http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bikelane-roadway/#comment-241 [...] seem right. This stew of issues could have been addressed by Rosenthal v. County of Pima (see Is a Bikelane part of the Roadway?) but instead it just ignored [...] […] seem right. This stew of issues could have been addressed by Rosenthal v. County of Pima (see Is a Bikelane part of the Roadway?) but instead it just ignored […]

]]> By: Dick Reynolds http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bikelane-roadway/#comment-225 Dick Reynolds Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:17:11 +0000 http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bikelane-roadway/#comment-225 <p>In Arizona what is the definition of a "bicycle path or lane" and what are the required markings?</p> <p><em>-- Hi Dick. There is no definition explicitly in A.R.S. for those terms, however the MUTCD is incorporated by reference (28-641). So see <a href="http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/htm/2003/part9/part9-toc.htm" rel="nofollow">Part 9</a> of the MUTCD</p> <p>And also, I need to update this article -- there is some case law from Pima Superior Court that refers to this issue (I need to dig up that reference.)<br /> </em></p> In Arizona what is the definition of a “bicycle path or lane” and what are the required markings?

– Hi Dick. There is no definition explicitly in A.R.S. for those terms, however the MUTCD is incorporated by reference (28-641). So see Part 9 of the MUTCD

And also, I need to update this article — there is some case law from Pima Superior Court that refers to this issue (I need to dig up that reference.)

]]>