<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bicycles May Use Full Lane, SLM; MUTCD updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycles-may-use-full-lane-slm-mutcd-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycles-may-use-full-lane-slm-mutcd-updates/</link>
	<description>Cycling, traffic safety and legal topics; energy, transit and transportion economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:42:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard C. Moeur</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycles-may-use-full-lane-slm-mutcd-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2547</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C. Moeur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=828#comment-2547</guid>
		<description>The 35 MPH wording was inserted during final debate at the January 2007 meeting of the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Approval would have been unlikely without this provision (it had already been voted down in June 2005).

Note that the 35 MPH wording is a Guidance condition; i.e. recommended but not mandatory. An agency can install SLMs on roadways with higher speed limits, as long as engineering judgment or an engineering study indicates that it is appropriate.

rcm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 35 MPH wording was inserted during final debate at the January 2007 meeting of the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Approval would have been unlikely without this provision (it had already been voted down in June 2005).</p>
<p>Note that the 35 MPH wording is a Guidance condition; i.e. recommended but not mandatory. An agency can install SLMs on roadways with higher speed limits, as long as engineering judgment or an engineering study indicates that it is appropriate.</p>
<p>rcm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycles-may-use-full-lane-slm-mutcd-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2472</link>
		<dc:creator>BB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=828#comment-2472</guid>
		<description>Yes but 75 percent of Phoenix is residential roads. 

I wonder why the 35 mph limit is there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes but 75 percent of Phoenix is residential roads. </p>
<p>I wonder why the 35 mph limit is there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Romeo Alpha</title>
		<link>http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycles-may-use-full-lane-slm-mutcd-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-2408</link>
		<dc:creator>John Romeo Alpha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/?p=828#comment-2408</guid>
		<description>I posted today about the &quot;helmeted bicyclist symbol&quot; from the 2009 MUTCD that is replacing the diamond symbols on bike lanes that I have ridden on recently. I just noticed it this morning, but couldn&#039;t find a reference online for exactly when they started doing that in Phoenix. I&#039;m with you regarding the sharrows; most of the Valley would not appear to be suited for them. Perhaps downtown streets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted today about the &#8220;helmeted bicyclist symbol&#8221; from the 2009 MUTCD that is replacing the diamond symbols on bike lanes that I have ridden on recently. I just noticed it this morning, but couldn&#8217;t find a reference online for exactly when they started doing that in Phoenix. I&#8217;m with you regarding the sharrows; most of the Valley would not appear to be suited for them. Perhaps downtown streets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
