http://azbikelaw.org/blog/applicability-statutes-why-are-there-two/ Cycling, traffic safety and legal topics; energy, transit and transportion economics Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:42:27 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://azbikelaw.org/blog/applicability-statutes-why-are-there-two/comment-page-1/#comment-718 Arizona Bike Law Blog » Blog Archive » Do "points" apply to bicyclists? Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:17:33 +0000 http://azbikelaw.org/blog/applicability-statutes-why-are-there-two/#comment-718 [...] then this analysis seems to ignore the applicability statute, which specifically makes bicyclists “subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver [...] [...] then this analysis seems to ignore the applicability statute, which specifically makes bicyclists “subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver [...]

]]> http://azbikelaw.org/blog/applicability-statutes-why-are-there-two/comment-page-1/#comment-347 Arizona Bike Law Blog » Blog Archive » Is a Bikelane part of the Roadway? Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:44:17 +0000 http://azbikelaw.org/blog/applicability-statutes-why-are-there-two/#comment-347 [...] twist here being that the applicability statute was §28-811 , and not §28-812 (also see Applicability Statutes - why are there two?). Confusingly, both say when and which statutes apply to bicyclists; 811 says that “this [...] [...] twist here being that the applicability statute was §28-811 , and not §28-812 (also see Applicability Statutes – why are there two?). Confusingly, both say when and which statutes apply to bicyclists; 811 says that “this [...]

]]>