-
48th Street; Piedmont to Guadalupe gets SLMs (sharrows)
Posted on January 17th, 2012 2 commentsI have a lot of thoughts about this stretch of roadway in Phoenix: 48th Street (turns into Guadalupe Rd), north of Piedmont.
It involves the odd geographic position of the Ahwatukee area of Phoenix; and the the almost complete lack of connectivity for Ahwatukee residents to anywhere else, (Tempe, Chandler, and indeed the main portion of Phoenix) except by car-choked umteen lane roads.Ahwatukee is called — sometimes derisively, sometimes happily — the world’s largest cul-de-sac. Setting aside 48th street for a moment; Ahwatukee’s ONLY ingress/egress is Pecos Rd (which is loop 202, a limited-access highway), Chandler Blvd (10 lanes?), Ray Road (10 lanes), Warner Road (only 6 lanes?), Elliot Road (10 lanes?). So these are all either a limited-access freeway, or humongous monstrosities that have interchanges with I-10.
In short, these are all car-choked, car-sewers. They are not particularly bad for cyclists; two (Ray, and Chandler) have wide-curb lanes; Warner has nice narrow lanes; I find Elliot road to be most annoying as it is (or was?) “critical width“; that is to say not wide yet not narrow enough to be perceived as too narrow to share by many motorists. Yet many cyclists, understandably, don’t want to do it. It is a thoroughly obnoxious experience for pedestrians, too.
48th Street/Guadalupe is the ONLY bridge over I-10 that is a reasonable human scale, it is 2-lanes (only 1 in each direction!), and has no interchange with the freeway, it’s just a bridge. Thus this makes a vital connection for anyone wishing to bike between Ahwatukee and, say, Tempe/ASU. And it also forms the ONLY connection for Ahawatukee bicyclists wishing to get to the rest of Phoenix (through The Pointe at South Mountain, now called ???. Using what are actually private streets but there’s some sort of public easement).
Why are there no other non-interchange bridges over I-10? E.g. in Tempe, Hardy Dr crosses US60; and there is a ped-bridge just a mile or two away at College. Ahwatukee is like 5 miles. Why don’t ANY collector roads, e.g. Knox Road, cross I-10?
Back to the present case
Here are a bunch of captioned pictures: azbikelaw.org/images/48thGuad
So this stretch of 48th street has been a continuous bone-of-contention for years. North of Piedmont, the road consists of two no-questions-about-it narrow lanes (perhaps 11 feet) in each direction. The posted speed limit is 35mph. There is no shoulder (only an odd edge line just to the left of the gutter-pan joint). There is a raised median; the median appears to be approx 18 feet (curbface-to-curbface) wide.
Let’s be very clear: cyclists may (legally) and should (for safety) be riding IN THE MIDDLE OF THE (right) LANE when going straight ahead.
It appears the best thing the city could do would be to install Shared Lane Markings (SLM, a.k.a. “Sharrows”). The standard calls for “the centers of the Shared Lane Markings should be at least 4 feet from the face of the curb”… in my opinion placing them at the minimum 4′ is confusing far to the right in an 11′ lane (who came up with that spec?). The gutter pan is about 1 foot, perhaps a little more — I would want to see the center of the marking to be something like 6′ from curbface.
For extra credit, I would also like to see some BMUFL signs (see same link above as Shared Lane Markings).
Sharrows Appear[update 1/17/2012. There is an email from city engineer Kerry Wilcoxon explaining more about the situation and plan for fix/finishing here. In paraphrase, the city is having some delay/difficulty procuring thermoplastic slm's -- once they do, they with fix the bad ones and apply correctly in thermo all along the whole stretch; but there is not timeframe given]
Some sharrows appeared on a the northern section, the part that still shows the edgelines, sometime in very late December 2011. (in other words, the part that wasn’t resurfaced, traffic engineers apparently refer to this as an ‘overlay’, somewhat recently, perhaps mid-2011, which obliterated the lines which were thankfully not restored)
They appear to have been placed at the bare minimum of 4′ from curbface. This leads to problems; though the lane is clearly narrow, this position is going to encourage riders to ride too far to the right, as well as drivers to expect (demand?) that cyclists ride at the right edge. This is contrary to both law ( ride-to-the right, §28-815A, doesn’t apply in narrow lanes, because of exception #4) and safety (e.g. see ADOT Street Smarts: “On a multilane road with narrow lane, ride in the middle of the right lane”).
The sharrows should be place something like 6′ from curbface. Cyclists who wish to can still ride as far to the right as they please. And it puts motorists on notice that they should expect to see cyclists in the middle of the lane, as cyclists are taught to do.
I can only hope this is some sort of temporary test sort of thing, and these existing sharrows can get moved, and they can be properly positioned in the other section of 48th Street that presently has no sharrows (the un-edgelined part, down to Piedmont). BMUFL signs would be welcome, too… In their present incarnation as placed, these markings are hurting, not helping. (as mentioned in the above update, it appears they will be moved to the left so stay tuned)
Bikes May Use Full Lane Signs
As of 1/5/2011 the BMUFL (R4-11) signs are in place; it looks like there are six of them. I think these signs are great — that is, unlike a “share the road” sign, they have very little chance of being mis-interpreted. I was a little surprised at how many cyclists I saw just in 15 minutes while taking pictures. I noted 5 cyclists total not counting myself: 3 southbound ( #1 shows a motorist waiting to turn right , #2: showing some good motorist passing examples, and #3: a gutter bunny where motorists don’t change lanes to pass), one northbound, and one northbound conterflow on the sidewalk. Given the time of day, 4pm,the predominant traffic flow was southbound as expected.
I do have a gripe with the signs, at least two of them are heavily obscured by other signs, and thus are less likely to be seen by motorists. I have no idea how easy it is to address this problem, in one case some of the obstruction is from tree branches which seems simple enough to fix. In other cases, it may be that there are just too many (other) signs.. dunno.
This one is obscured by some tree branches and the “welcome to Phoenix” sign. I took this from the median, the view from where a driver would be is far more obstructed. Could the BMUFL sign be hung on the same post as the welcome sign? — that would make it a lot more visible
Another is obscured by a really big directional sign. Not sure what the solution is, the road curvature is a problem.
…
Here is a link to sharrow (“Shared Lane Markings”) and BMUFL sign info in the MUTCD.
Leave a reply


azbikelaw December 12th, 2011 at 20:46